Infowars host Alex Jones loses libel cases after Sandy Hook shoots ‘hoax’ plot

A judge in the US state of Texas has found Infowars host and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones liable for damages in three libel lawsuits brought by parents of two children killed in the Sandy school massacre Hook.

Jones had repeatedly claimed on his talk show that the mass shooting was a “hoax.”

Judge Maya Guerra Gamble has issued default judgments against Jones, Infowars and other defendants for what she called their “blatant bad faith and blatant disregard” of court orders to turn over documents to the parents’ attorneys.

The decisions were released on Monday and released on Thursday.

Cases are now heading to a jury trial to determine how much damages Jones and the other defendants will have to pay the families.

The Sandy Hook Massacre

The school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012 killed 20 first graders and six teachers.

Families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims campaigned against gun violence and the National Rifle Association.(

Reuters: Jonathan Ernst


The gunman, Adam Lanza, 20, shot his mother in their Newtown home before going to school, and killed himself when police arrived.

The shoot was described on Jones’ Infowars show as a hoax involving actors designed to increase gun control.

Jones has since admitted that the school shooting took place.

Families of some of the victims of the school shooting have sued Jones, Infowars and others in Texas and Connecticut courts for hoax conspiracy, claiming they were harassed and threatened with death by Jones supporters .

Connecticut affairs remain pending.

Jones’ lawyers invoke free speech protections

Jones and his Connecticut attorney Norman Pattis criticized the Texas judge’s ruling in a statement posted to the Infowars website.

“This does not take into account the tens of thousands of documents produced by the defendants, the hours spent sitting for depositions and the various affidavits filed in these cases,” they said.

“We are shocked by what we see as a flagrant abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. We are determined to ensure that these cases are heard on the merits.”

Jones’ lawyers have denied the defamation allegations and argued that his comments about the school shooting were protected by the right to free speech.

Alex Jones speaks over a loudspeaker during a pro-Trump protest against the 2020 election result.
Alex Jones speaks at a rally of Trump supporters to protest against the results of the 2020 presidential election.(

Reuters: Jim Urquhart / File photo


Bill Ogden, a Houston attorney representing the four parents in the Texas cases, said Jones and Infowars had not turned over any documents in recent years.

He added that such default judgments were rare.

“My clients have suffered and continue to suffer the accused’s 5-year campaign of loathsome lies,” Ogden said in a statement, which cited the judge’s ruling.

“We think the court hit the nail on the head when it considered Alex Jones and Infowars ” bad faith approach ‘in this litigation, Mr Jones’ ‘public threats’ and the conviction Jones that these proceedings are show trials, ‘”he said.

Judge Guerra Gamble said in her rulings that she was defaulting Jones and the other defendants after a “growing series” of warnings by judges, monetary fines and other actions failed to succeed. get the accused to hand over documents.

A story of defying court orders

In 2019, Jones was ordered by another Texas judge to pay $ 100,000 in legal fees to one of the parents’ attorneys for ignoring a court order to produce witnesses.

Jones was also penalized in the Connecticut cases for violating numerous delivery orders and for an outburst of anger on his webcast against a lawyer for some of the victims’ relatives.

A judge barred Jones from filing a motion to dismiss the case – a decision that was upheld after appealing to the United States Supreme Court, which refused to hear Jones’ appeal in April.


Source link